I like how you have incorporated scientific language to explain supermundane concepts. Describing the TO as the “genes” of the universe rather than referring to it as the “spirit” as earlier metaphysical investigators would have is quite clever. Although maybe the analogy isn’t as close, the idea conveyed is clearer when referred to this way.
It really does feel like I closed some kind of circuit in my mind with this. I don't know what the result will be, but suddenly everything is snapping together left and right.
Back to the Future would be worth a rewatch actually, I will check it out!
Thank you. Absolute brilliant start to the series. Some thoughts:
- The game of the cosmos is a play between Logos and Eros. Expansion and Contraction. The drive of Logos goes from union into multiplicity, division and therefore necessarily disorder. The drive of Eros goes from multiplicity into union, connectedness and order. The Rubik’s Cube least entropic state is its solution. So to constellate a TO, how you described it, is to reverse entropy with the will of life. With the will of an angel which represents our potential at the end of history, towards its pull we (inevitably?) converge to.
- Synchronictiy as a signal of the underlying higher order principle revealing itself in the maze.
- The exploration of quantum mechanics is us pushing up through the holographic simulation into a more condensed order of the cosmos.
- The will of an angel is trans-personal in the most literal sense of the word. If you don’t pick up the current, somebody else will. If you don’t finish your work, somebody else will. So to be the most benefit for all is to connect as much to your higher angel as you can. The angel is you in the far future. If you don’t make the steps now, you will do it in your next life. There’s really only one thing to do. To do what thou willt.
- If the will of Eros is „angelic“ the will of Logos is „demonic“. They are opposed to maintain a dynamic balance. Too much order becomes static death and too much disorder becomes chaotic death.
- Constellating how you describe it with the Rubik’s Cube is angel-tech. It seeks to reverse entropy. However, I see it as neutral. An octahedron is two pyramids ontop of each other. You can also constellate a demonic TO through densening the holographic layers downwards into more obscurity, confusion, division but also again; multiplicity. Like Mark Zuckerberg would with the Metaverse.
- Through Logos we get ever new forms, but who are ever more simulacrafied. Through Eros we get ever more unification, but whose identity is ever more collectivized.
- Considering all the above I think the dualistic understanding of angel and demon doesn’t hold up. The „Angel/Daimon“ at the end of history is the holistic culmination of our angelic and demonic energies but which still overall serves the progression of Life. God evolves through the interplay of demonic and angelic.
I love the idea of angels having trans-personal wills. It seems that many are "contacted" and it is up to them to follow the call.
That said, I do think a dualistic understanding of angels and demons can hold up.
Demons = Fallen angels of this simulation, the archons of the maze, the servants of the demiurge. In this context, Crowley was contacted by a demon giving him the law "do what thou willt." or the permission to play god in this corrupted creation.
Angels = Servants of source, the loving and perfect creator beyond this fallen world, which desires humanity to seek it out through love, empathy, intuition.
Following this line of thinking, God is already perfect and does not require evolution.
The choice is to play god and die or unite with God and live.
Crowley loved to provocate and paint himself as a degenerat. He was like the original edgelord. So much is to be taken with a grain of salt. But he made it pretty clear what he actually meant with "do what thou wilt". To do the will of your higher self or holy guardian angel as he called it. But I agree his contact with Aiwaz is sus to say the least. Looked like a gray alien, was blatently anti-christian and even psychopathic if you take the "Liber Al vel Legis" literally.
To your angel definition. If theres only one source, everything has to serve it somehow. Even in their opposition demons are serving source, if they want it or not.
But overall with most metaphysical questions it's neither and both. Everything and Nothing. So God is perfect but imperfect. Hope this makes sense and I'm not just being intellectually lazy lol.
Yes, I think Crowley lost his mind / was possessed, and he was tricked by Aiwaz to develop his ''higher self'' through sin.
As for the one source / God, it is true everything is part of it, but I believe it gives everything freewill to join or oppose. Fallen angels want to break free from their reliance on source and sin to become gods themself.
Also I have doubts about god being the pleuroma /;being neither and both simultaneously. The satanic elites seem to hold this gnostic view to justify their worship of reason and power.
Well yea to be honest on the last one I'm not sure either, I was regurgitating what the enlightened people tell about their experience. For example Frank Yang.
capital functions in the space of no-ideology - there isn't a culture that can't be commodified, maybe because abstraction is precisely that which the internal theater presents in "default" ego-consciousness, below the level of awareness. so sometimes i see X as the invisible hand, not of the market, but of the collective unconscious, which has a fractal/holographic nature in us
"You cannot aim for synchronistities consciously, because they are not objects" hit hard but makes so much sense. Still reading but whoo boy this is what I signed up for.
So, the core identity of a complex entity can be simbolically represented as a faceted, reflective crystal with the shape of an octahedron that is above the thing it represents and cannot be fully seen by the thing it represents. Like the crystal from The Sims.
In all seriousness, this is an amazing way to systematize a philosophical but almost scientific explanation of identity as a platonic phenomenon rather than an emergent one. This falls perfectly in line with Dr Michael Levin's explanation of the Self in biology and complex systems in general, and a great flirting with his concept of the navigation of the anatomical morphic space. Things are approaching a peak of coherence, be prepared.
'Teleological Object' = AQ 333 = 'Son of Mercury / TO'
'TO' = AQ 53 = 'God'
I know you've expressed a respectful skepticism of gematria elsewhere but it only makes sense that gematria would be either hidden or derided until the time at which clear sense may be made of it. If the world was created gematrically, language, as the world itself, must be completed before it can be made transparent. The story must be told before the story can be understood. That moment of completion, as if one needed another sign of it - the history of art is surely already complete given the invention of image generators - is obviously rapidly approaching given the increasingly transparent meaningfulness of specifically English gematria - English being the most opaque language, or rather, the language most opaque to its current speakers.
'The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil' = AQ 666 = 'Of man's first disobedience, and the fruit'
If you haven't explored AQ much, I really recommend it.
Thanks for all your work! You and Seele know just how to spread the good news.
The image of the Octahedron, it being this stable teleological shape, that shocks me to my very core cause it relates to something close to me. Someone who, is always aiding me, and making it possible for me to even project myself here in this moment. Odd wording, I know, however it's what I felt needed to come out, so I'm not changing it.
I have a question for you. A decade ago, I was taken for my first acid trip, willingly but unprepared, by a man who could not have been a guide to me, though I did not know it at the time. I ascended into heaven. I fell back down to earth. Then I descended into hell. I've never escaped that night, and I don't know what I mean by that.
When I fell back down to earth, and landed in my body. I could feel weights hanging from my ankles and my wristis. I could FEEL them, as though they were my arms and legs. I felt the chains and I felt the weights, and I knew they bound me to this explicate order. Those weights were, without a doubt, octahedra and they hung from a vertices.
What you call the Labyrinth, he calls Moloch. There are a lot of similarities actually between his and your work, but also some new stuff that might be really inspiring and eye opening.
Keep up your work brother! We need more miracle consciousness
I like how you have incorporated scientific language to explain supermundane concepts. Describing the TO as the “genes” of the universe rather than referring to it as the “spirit” as earlier metaphysical investigators would have is quite clever. Although maybe the analogy isn’t as close, the idea conveyed is clearer when referred to this way.
Especially for our cultural context I think that's the only way he could've put it that would've actually clicked with us.
Feels like you've just discovered the Flux capacitor.
Once this baby hits 88mph, you're going to see some serious shit!
Have you seen the Back to the future series? I'd be interested in your take on it. It might be worth a rewatch.
https://youtu.be/LjriZhDoyNQ?si=deWE687tsVANvyLW
It really does feel like I closed some kind of circuit in my mind with this. I don't know what the result will be, but suddenly everything is snapping together left and right.
Back to the Future would be worth a rewatch actually, I will check it out!
Thank you. Absolute brilliant start to the series. Some thoughts:
- The game of the cosmos is a play between Logos and Eros. Expansion and Contraction. The drive of Logos goes from union into multiplicity, division and therefore necessarily disorder. The drive of Eros goes from multiplicity into union, connectedness and order. The Rubik’s Cube least entropic state is its solution. So to constellate a TO, how you described it, is to reverse entropy with the will of life. With the will of an angel which represents our potential at the end of history, towards its pull we (inevitably?) converge to.
- Synchronictiy as a signal of the underlying higher order principle revealing itself in the maze.
- The exploration of quantum mechanics is us pushing up through the holographic simulation into a more condensed order of the cosmos.
- The will of an angel is trans-personal in the most literal sense of the word. If you don’t pick up the current, somebody else will. If you don’t finish your work, somebody else will. So to be the most benefit for all is to connect as much to your higher angel as you can. The angel is you in the far future. If you don’t make the steps now, you will do it in your next life. There’s really only one thing to do. To do what thou willt.
- If the will of Eros is „angelic“ the will of Logos is „demonic“. They are opposed to maintain a dynamic balance. Too much order becomes static death and too much disorder becomes chaotic death.
- Constellating how you describe it with the Rubik’s Cube is angel-tech. It seeks to reverse entropy. However, I see it as neutral. An octahedron is two pyramids ontop of each other. You can also constellate a demonic TO through densening the holographic layers downwards into more obscurity, confusion, division but also again; multiplicity. Like Mark Zuckerberg would with the Metaverse.
- Through Logos we get ever new forms, but who are ever more simulacrafied. Through Eros we get ever more unification, but whose identity is ever more collectivized.
- Considering all the above I think the dualistic understanding of angel and demon doesn’t hold up. The „Angel/Daimon“ at the end of history is the holistic culmination of our angelic and demonic energies but which still overall serves the progression of Life. God evolves through the interplay of demonic and angelic.
I love the idea of angels having trans-personal wills. It seems that many are "contacted" and it is up to them to follow the call.
That said, I do think a dualistic understanding of angels and demons can hold up.
Demons = Fallen angels of this simulation, the archons of the maze, the servants of the demiurge. In this context, Crowley was contacted by a demon giving him the law "do what thou willt." or the permission to play god in this corrupted creation.
Angels = Servants of source, the loving and perfect creator beyond this fallen world, which desires humanity to seek it out through love, empathy, intuition.
Following this line of thinking, God is already perfect and does not require evolution.
The choice is to play god and die or unite with God and live.
Crowley loved to provocate and paint himself as a degenerat. He was like the original edgelord. So much is to be taken with a grain of salt. But he made it pretty clear what he actually meant with "do what thou wilt". To do the will of your higher self or holy guardian angel as he called it. But I agree his contact with Aiwaz is sus to say the least. Looked like a gray alien, was blatently anti-christian and even psychopathic if you take the "Liber Al vel Legis" literally.
To your angel definition. If theres only one source, everything has to serve it somehow. Even in their opposition demons are serving source, if they want it or not.
But overall with most metaphysical questions it's neither and both. Everything and Nothing. So God is perfect but imperfect. Hope this makes sense and I'm not just being intellectually lazy lol.
Yes, I think Crowley lost his mind / was possessed, and he was tricked by Aiwaz to develop his ''higher self'' through sin.
As for the one source / God, it is true everything is part of it, but I believe it gives everything freewill to join or oppose. Fallen angels want to break free from their reliance on source and sin to become gods themself.
Also I have doubts about god being the pleuroma /;being neither and both simultaneously. The satanic elites seem to hold this gnostic view to justify their worship of reason and power.
Well yea to be honest on the last one I'm not sure either, I was regurgitating what the enlightened people tell about their experience. For example Frank Yang.
capital functions in the space of no-ideology - there isn't a culture that can't be commodified, maybe because abstraction is precisely that which the internal theater presents in "default" ego-consciousness, below the level of awareness. so sometimes i see X as the invisible hand, not of the market, but of the collective unconscious, which has a fractal/holographic nature in us
"Identity is Conserved"
Anyone else feel like they just read the first chapter of the modern day Principia Mathematica? This man is the Aquarian Newton.
Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Synchronica
"You cannot aim for synchronistities consciously, because they are not objects" hit hard but makes so much sense. Still reading but whoo boy this is what I signed up for.
So, the core identity of a complex entity can be simbolically represented as a faceted, reflective crystal with the shape of an octahedron that is above the thing it represents and cannot be fully seen by the thing it represents. Like the crystal from The Sims.
In all seriousness, this is an amazing way to systematize a philosophical but almost scientific explanation of identity as a platonic phenomenon rather than an emergent one. This falls perfectly in line with Dr Michael Levin's explanation of the Self in biology and complex systems in general, and a great flirting with his concept of the navigation of the anatomical morphic space. Things are approaching a peak of coherence, be prepared.
'Teleological Object' = AQ 333 = 'Son of Mercury / TO'
'TO' = AQ 53 = 'God'
I know you've expressed a respectful skepticism of gematria elsewhere but it only makes sense that gematria would be either hidden or derided until the time at which clear sense may be made of it. If the world was created gematrically, language, as the world itself, must be completed before it can be made transparent. The story must be told before the story can be understood. That moment of completion, as if one needed another sign of it - the history of art is surely already complete given the invention of image generators - is obviously rapidly approaching given the increasingly transparent meaningfulness of specifically English gematria - English being the most opaque language, or rather, the language most opaque to its current speakers.
'The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil' = AQ 666 = 'Of man's first disobedience, and the fruit'
If you haven't explored AQ much, I really recommend it.
Thanks for all your work! You and Seele know just how to spread the good news.
The image of the Octahedron, it being this stable teleological shape, that shocks me to my very core cause it relates to something close to me. Someone who, is always aiding me, and making it possible for me to even project myself here in this moment. Odd wording, I know, however it's what I felt needed to come out, so I'm not changing it.
You, seem to be the missing link in my journey.
I have a question for you. A decade ago, I was taken for my first acid trip, willingly but unprepared, by a man who could not have been a guide to me, though I did not know it at the time. I ascended into heaven. I fell back down to earth. Then I descended into hell. I've never escaped that night, and I don't know what I mean by that.
When I fell back down to earth, and landed in my body. I could feel weights hanging from my ankles and my wristis. I could FEEL them, as though they were my arms and legs. I felt the chains and I felt the weights, and I knew they bound me to this explicate order. Those weights were, without a doubt, octahedra and they hung from a vertices.
What do you make of these weights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jb4CG3JoT8
"Position is negation" So simple yet, so profound.
What you call the Labyrinth, he calls Moloch. There are a lot of similarities actually between his and your work, but also some new stuff that might be really inspiring and eye opening.
Keep up your work brother! We need more miracle consciousness
https://youtu.be/yrgSwgqclJU?si=A0AHvFbIp9L72_Lw
Excellent piece, this is a great explanation, will have to reread it a couple of times to fully grasp it.
I assume this will be a series, very excited for that since this tackles the question I asked in the last Q&A!